<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>open-climate.ai Research</title>
    <link>https://open-climate.ai/docs/research/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://open-climate.ai/docs/research/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <description>Dated studies on emission factors: what we measured, how, and what it means for a carbon inventory.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>How wrong are spend-based GHG estimates? We measured it</title>
      <link>https://open-climate.ai/docs/research/spend-based-estimates/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://open-climate.ai/docs/research/spend-based-estimates/</guid>
      <description>We tested EXIOBASE, Open CEDA and USEEIO against 7,040 EPDs. Half the spend-based estimates were off by more than a factor of 2.</description>
      <dc:creator>Robin Dierckx</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
