For corporates

Instant insight into your Scope 1, 2 and 3

Export the purchase ledger you already have and run it. Within the same session you see which suppliers carry your footprint, what they sold you and how much of the number they move, before anyone sends out a single questionnaire.

Choose a file

One file in, a picture of the footprint out. Then you decide where the real data collection is worth doing.

Where the emissions come fromone run

8,240
tCO₂e, financial year: 96%
of lines matched, 4,610 of 4,800

Scope 1 · 2%
Scope 2 · 6%
Scope 3 · 92%

Illustrative shape of a first run. The total, the split and the suppliers come out of your own ledger.

96%of lines usable as returned, on the open benchmarkread the benchmark

0-20%of your own file left for you to check, and it names the lines

269,551emission factor values to match a purchase line againstmore coming

…public libraries, normalised into one modelmore coming

What you get on the first run

A number, and the shape behind it

A defensible total

Every line matched to a published factor, with the boundary and the year it came from, and the lines that could not be matched named rather than dropped.

The suppliers that carry it

Your spend ranked by emissions rather than by invoice value, which is rarely the same order.

The gaps, named

Which lines need a real answer from the business, and which are close enough to leave alone this year.

Where to spend the effort

The twenty lines that decide the number

The agent ranks what you sent by emissions and tells you where the number actually sits. You work down that list, not across the file.

01
Rank by emissions, not by spend
A cheap line can carry more carbon than an expensive one. The order changes the moment the factors are applied.
02
Go up the list, not across it
A fifth of the lines usually carries most of the total. That is where a supplier-specific figure is worth chasing.
03
Replace the top of the list first
Swap a generic factor for a supplier's own figure on the lines that move the number, then run the file again.

Top emitting suppliers

6 of 412 suppliers

Supplier	Emissions	Share
NORDBETON NVScope 3.1ready-mix concrete	1,310 t	16%
ACIERS DU NORD SAScope 3.1steel and rebar	980 t	12%
TRANSLOG EUROPEScope 3.4road freight	640 t	8%
HELIOS IT SUPPLYScope 3.2laptops and servers	470 t	6%
ATLAS PACKAGINGScope 3.1corrugated and film	360 t	4%
GRAND EST CATERINGScope 3.1canteen and events	240 t	3%

Top 20 suppliers · 5,020 t · 61% of the footprint

Illustrative. The names and the order come out of your ledger.

Afterwards

Import the results into the tool you already report from

A workbook

Your own rows with the factor, the boundary and the emissions beside them, ready to import.

An API response

The same fields as JSON, so your systems can write them straight into the inventory.

Inside your carbon tool

Already available in Carbon+Alt+Delete, with more integrations on the way.

A second use case

Check a footprint somebody else produced

Run last year's inventory back through the agent and see where the two disagree, before an auditor does.

Check an existing footprint

Where the two passes disagree

1,240 lines compared

1,106lines agree
98worth a look
36a material gap

Line	Their factor	Ours	Delta
Recycled steel, 3 t	Primary route	Secondary route	-58%
Electricity, 412 MWh	EU average grid	BE grid, location-based	-31%
Diesel, 1,200 L	Combustion only	Well to use	+23%

Illustrative. A second pass changes the factor, not your quantities, so every gap points at a decision somebody made.

What people say

A true game improver, freeing more time and resources for action
DavidCountry Lead Belgium, SouthpoleCarbon accounting consultancy · Belgium
We saw which suppliers carry our Scope 3 before the first questionnaire went out. The questionnaire got a lot shorter.
AnnaHead of SustainabilityFood manufacturer · Germany
Thirty thousand SAP lines, matched over a lunch break, with an assumption log our auditor could read. Last year that was three months.
KarimGroup Carbon ManagerIndustrial group · Netherlands