Japan MOE - 環境省 / 経済産業省 (Ministry of the Environment / Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry)

Japan's statutory emission factors for reporting companies: one coefficient per electricity retailer and tariff menu, per city gas and heat supplier, and per fuel, published by the Ministry of the Environment and METI.

GovernmentSpecialistOpen licence

Publisher's page Browse 1,663 factors

Factors

1,663

Values

1,693

One per year and method

Countries

2 regions, sub-national included

Edition

all versions

Last loaded

24 Sept 2026

Report a newer version

Overview

Japan's Mandatory GHG Accounting and Reporting System requires large emitters to report their emissions with official coefficients. The Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry publish them on policies.env.go.jp: registers of electricity retailers, city gas suppliers and heat suppliers, and a master list of calculation methods and factors.

The supplier registers let a company use the coefficient of the retailer, and of the tariff menu, it actually buys from. The fuel list gives the combustion factor of each fuel.

At a glance

Publisher: 環境省 / 経済産業省 (Ministry of the Environment / Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry)
Kind: Government
Scope: Specialist2 categories each hold at least 5% of its factors; the largest, Electricity, holds 88.7%. A generalist needs 4.
Home region: Japan
Edition: R8
Licence: Open licence (pdl-1.0)

Open data

How this works

Standardised file

環境省 / 経済産業省 (Ministry of the Environment / Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry), standardised by open-climate.ai

The publisher's file, re-cut into the schema every library on open-climate.ai shares: one category axis, coded regions, canonical units, AR6 warming potentials, the source row kept beside each value. What is in the file

Edition R8xlsxen1,663 rows · built 2026-09-01 · d89be8522923free account required
Edition R8csven1,663 rows · built 2026-09-01 · 8b510d009335free account required

What open-climate.ai standardised

over the publisher's own fileHow we standardise

One category axis

1,663 of 1,663 factor values mapped to one category

1,663 keep the publisher's own classification too

Learn more 6 checks behind this

Coded regions

2 regions as ISO or registry codes

1,663 take the publisher's default region, stated rather than assumed

Learn more 3 checks behind this

Canonical units

3 canonical units in 3 unit families, raw unit kept

6 factor values convert to a related unit

Learn more 4 checks behind this

Warming potentials

0 factor values recalculated on AR6

0 factor values already on AR6

0 factor values left on the publisher's GWP

1,663 factor values the same on every GWP

Learn more 7 checks behind this

7 more things standardised

Declared boundaries

2 boundary codes

Learn more 7 checks behind this

Electricity mix

1,628 electricity factors state their instrument; one default, market first

Learn more 5 checks behind this

Data quality

1,663 of 1,663 factor values rated on one quality tier

Learn more 7 checks behind this

EPDs and suppliers

1,624 factor values naming a supplier

Learn more 1 check behind this

Languages

English: 100.0% of factor values

German: 100.0% of factor values

French: 100.0% of factor values

Japanese: 100.0% of factor values

Learn more 9 checks behind this · 2 known limitations

Traceable to the source

1,674 source rows archived

11 rows skipped, each with a reason

Learn more 4 checks behind this

Stable addresses

Slugs never break

1,659 old addresses redirect

Learn more

Audit checks

90 passed2 known limitations3 enforced when loadedlast run 25 Sept 2026

Checks we run on every load to keep the data above trustworthy. Counts are for this library; the grey figure is the same check across all libraries. Point at the i to see why a check matters.

What the statuses mean How checks are counted Why we check How checks are grouped

Needs attention

Translations match the current source text
Known limitation · 140 in this library · 286,941 in all libraries
Why it matters When the publisher rewords a label, an old translation can describe a different activity than the one priced.
Factors are searched on their English name where one exists
Known limitation · 1 in this library · 7 in all libraries
Why it matters Search matches your query against one name per factor. A name kept in the publisher's language, when an English one exists, is harder to find in English.

One category axis

Learn more

Every source category maps to our vocabulary
Enforced when loaded
Why it matters A factor with no category drops out of every category filter and comparison. The load stops rather than serve one.
The publisher's classification is kept
Passed
Why it matters You can still find a factor the way the publisher filed it, and check our mapping against theirs.
Every classification level has a valid parent
Passed
Why it matters A broken tree hides factors from browse and puts them in the wrong category totals.
Every product code comes with the codes above it
Passed
Why it matters In product codes like HS or CPC, a search for a chapter should reach every code inside it. A missing level hides the factor from that search.
A publisher's own classification is used only by that publisher
Passed
Why it matters A publisher's own tree only makes sense inside its library. Filed under another publisher's codes, a factor would show up in categories that do not describe it.
A standard classification code has one label in every library
Passed
Why it matters Codes like NACE or NAICS are meant to link libraries. If one code carries two labels, you cannot tell whether both libraries mean the same activity.

Coded regions

Learn more

Every region is a known code
Enforced when loaded
Why it matters Free text like “France continentale” cannot be filtered or joined to your own data. A code can.
No named region is filed under a broader one
Passed
Why it matters A French factor filed as World would be applied to the wrong country, or lose to a global value in a search for France.
Every region sits in the world hierarchy
Passed
Why it matters A search for Europe has to reach France. A region outside the hierarchy is invisible to broader searches.

Canonical units

Learn more

Every unit is a known code
Enforced when loaded
Why it matters Activity data only multiplies correctly when the unit is exact. An unknown unit stops the load.
One source unit maps to one unit
Passed
Why it matters If one of the publisher's units were read as two different units, factors that share it would give inconsistent footprints.
A unit label means the same in every library
Passed
Why it matters Comparing two libraries is only safe when a label like t.km means tonne-kilometre in both.
A unit label that names no basis folds one way
Passed · 1 in all libraries
Why it matters A label like GJ says nothing about the heating value behind it. If the same bare label folds to two different units, two factors that look alike are not comparable.

Declared boundaries

Learn more

Every boundary states what it includes
Passed
Why it matters Cradle-to-gate and full life-cycle values can differ several times over. Without a stated boundary you cannot tell which you are adding up.
Boundary scope terms are known codes
Passed
Why it matters Consistent terms let you keep exactly the life-cycle stages your inventory needs.
No two factors for the same activity partly overlap in scope
Passed
Why it matters Two totals that share some stages but not all cannot safely be added or swapped: adding them counts the shared stages twice.
Separate stages of one activity are linked as parts
Passed
Why it matters Stages served as unrelated factors give no total, so you may use one stage and miss the others.
Every part of a factor states its boundary
Passed
Why it matters A part with an unknown boundary cannot be told apart from the other parts, so you cannot pick out, say, the combustion share of a total.
Each biofuel follows one convention for biogenic CO2
Passed · 12 in all libraries
Why it matters Burning a biofuel releases CO2 that some publishers count and others leave out, so the same fuel can differ many times over between libraries.
No recycling credit is hidden inside a life-cycle total
Passed
Why it matters A negative total may be a credit for avoided emissions. Filed as a life-cycle burden, it would quietly subtract emissions from your footprint.

Warming potentials

Learn more

Methane and nitrous oxide figures match the stated GWP
Passed
Why it matters If a gas's CO2e is not its mass times the stated GWP, the GWP label is wrong, and converting the value to another GWP version would give a wrong result.
Every convertible value has its AR6 version
Passed
Why it matters Reporting now asks for AR6. Mixing AR5 and AR6 shifts methane-heavy totals by several percent.
CO2e totals agree with their gases
Passed · 3,229 in all libraries
Why it matters A value labelled fossil-only should carry no gas other than CO2 and not exceed its own CO2. When it does, the label or the total is wrong.
Fossil-only values list the gases that back the label
Passed · 19,942 in all libraries
Why it matters With no breakdown by gas, nothing can confirm the fossil-only label. The value rests on the publisher's word alone.
Standardised figures keep every gas the publisher lists
Passed
Why it matters The comparable figure we serve must carry each gas the publisher reported. A lost gas makes the breakdown disagree with the total and hides that gas from you.
Every value states what its CO2e total includes
Passed
Why it matters For a biofuel, a total with or without biogenic CO2 can differ widely. Without that convention you cannot tell which one you are comparing.
A library with no AR6 version at all has a recorded reason
Passed
Why it matters Values that cannot be converted to AR6 cannot be compared with AR6 figures. That has to be a documented decision, not something missed at load.

Electricity mix

Learn more

Every electricity factor states its mix
Passed
Why it matters Without its mix you cannot tell a location-based figure from a market-based one, and Scope 2 reporting needs both side by side.
The market-based value is the default
Passed
Why it matters The default then matches the figure most Scope 2 reports lead with, and a green-tariff zero is never the default when another figure exists.
One default value per factor and year
Passed
Why it matters Two defaults for one year give two answers to the same lookup.
Every green-electricity zero is a market-based value
Passed
Why it matters A zero from a green contract only holds for the buyer of that contract. Filed as location-based, it would put a zero on the physical grid.
Green-electricity zeros are not rated below market-based peers
Passed
Why it matters A green-contract zero is the contract's own figure. Marked down for being zero, it would lose to less relevant values when you look up contracted supply.

Data quality

Learn more

Quality ratings fall inside their scale
Passed
Why it matters An out-of-scale rating cannot be compared, so the value would be ranked arbitrarily.
Every zero value is explained
Passed
Why it matters A zero can be real (contracted renewable power) or a gap in the data. A gap read as real erases emissions from your total.
No default value is withheld for poor quality
Passed
Why it matters A default rated too poor to serve is hidden from search and exports, so that factor is missing for you even when it is the right one.
No implausibly high per-kilogram value is rated reliable
Passed
Why it matters Above 1,000 kgCO2e per kg is often a unit slip, such as grams read as kilograms. Rated reliable, such a value could inflate a footprint a thousandfold.
Every quality level gives a recognised reason
Passed
Why it matters The reason explains why a value got its quality level. An unrecognised one cannot be filtered on or explained to you.
A zero that is only a gap in the source is withheld
Passed
Why it matters A zero with no quality signal, or an implausible regulatory default of zero, is more likely missing data than a real zero. Served, it would erase emissions from your total.
The library is not rated entirely on one fallback quality level
Passed
Why it matters When every value gets the same level because the publisher gives no quality signal, the level tells you nothing and cannot rank one value above another.

EPDs and suppliers

Learn more

A supplier named in the source is linked to the factor
Passed
Why it matters If the supplier is named but not linked, you cannot filter by supplier or tell a company's own figure from a generic one.

Languages

Learn more

Every factor has an English name
Passed
Why it matters Every factor can be searched and cited in one shared language, whatever the publisher's.
Translations match the current source text
Known limitation · 140 in this library · 286,941 in all libraries
Why it matters When the publisher rewords a label, an old translation can describe a different activity than the one priced.
Every served factor has a name
Passed
Why it matters A factor with no name in any language shows as a blank row: you cannot search for it or tell what it measures.
Factors are searched on their English name where one exists
Known limitation · 1 in this library · 7 in all libraries
Why it matters Search matches your query against one name per factor. A name kept in the publisher's language, when an English one exists, is harder to find in English.
Every language with a main name also has a full name
Passed
Why it matters Without the full name, the detail that tells similar factors apart is missing in that language, so two different factors can look identical.
Full names are built from their parts in the same language
Passed
Why it matters A full name must read as the main name followed by its detail. Translated separately, it can drift and describe a slightly different activity.
Every text is labelled with its real language
Passed
Why it matters A French name labelled English would be shown to English readers and matched against English searches.
Every description is available for display and translation
Passed
Why it matters A description missing from the per-language text store is not shown in your language, and never gets translated.
Every usage note is available for display and translation
Passed
Why it matters Names and notes are served from one text store per language. A note missing from that store is not shown, and never gets translated.

Traceable to the source

Learn more

Values traced to one source row agree with each other
Passed
Why it matters Each value traces back to one source row. When values that disagree share a row, it can back only one of them, which weakens that audit trail.
No duplicate factors are served
Passed · 302 in all libraries
Why it matters Identical duplicates split search results and invite counting the same factor twice.
No factor value claims two things that cannot both be true
Passed · 5,836 in all libraries
Why it matters For example, a purchaser price that leaves out retail or delivery, or packaging on an energy unit. One of the two claims is wrong, and you cannot tell which.
No factor value the publisher has withdrawn is still served
Passed · 556 in all libraries
Why it matters The publisher's end date for the value has passed. The figure may be out of date, so look for a newer one before you use it.

Other checks

An activity's grouping key names only the activity
Passed · 6 in all libraries
Why it matters If the key also carried the unit, country or scope, one activity would split into several, and search would not show you its other versions side by side.
A Creative Commons credit names its licence
Passed
Why it matters CC BY asks you to say which licence applies. A credit that leaves it out makes your attribution incomplete when you copy it.
No note of ours appears in the credit or licence notice
Passed
Why it matters Our own notes on how we handle the data would end up in the credit you reproduce, as if the publisher had written them.
The credit line carries no terms of use
Passed
Why it matters You copy the credit line as it stands. Terms of use belong in the licence notice, which you read rather than reproduce.
Every part links to a valid parent
Passed
Why it matters A part that points nowhere gets summed twice or dropped when you use the parent total.
Every impact assessment method is a recognised code
Passed
Why it matters Free text in place of a code splits one method into several spellings, so filtering by method misses some of its values.
Summed totals keep their parts' classification
Passed
Why it matters A total takes a classification only when all its parts share it. Otherwise it lands in a category its parts do not support, or misses one they all share.
Every summed total has a classification when its parts do
Passed
Why it matters A total with no classification drops out of every category filter, even though its parts are filed there.
An avoided credit is linked to the burden it belongs to
Passed
Why it matters Served on its own, a credit reads as a factor in its own right. Linked beside its burden, it applies only where it belongs and is never subtracted twice.
Every value is typed as specific, generic or average
Passed
Why it matters The type says how closely a figure fits the product you bought. Any other word would be invisible to a filter on it.
Summed totals equal their parts on every gas
Passed
Why it matters Where a total is the sum of its parts, the two must agree on every gas. Otherwise your footprint changes depending on whether you use the total or the parts.
Validity dates are the publisher's own, never guessed
Passed
Why it matters A start date we invented looks just like one the publisher printed, and would hide correct factor values from a search for what applied on a given date.
Quality breakdowns use their scheme's axes
Passed
Why it matters A score on an axis the scheme does not define, or off its scale, cannot be read, so the breakdown behind a rating would mislead.
No battery-electric vehicle carries tailpipe emissions
Passed
Why it matters An electric vehicle has no tailpipe. A non-zero combustion figure means its electricity emissions sit in the wrong place, or are counted twice.
The text of each estimated factor matches its current figures
Passed
Why it matters An estimated factor's description states the year, shares and quality behind it. If those moved, the text would explain a different number than the one served.
A total built on an estimated part is marked as estimated
Passed
Why it matters If the total lost the mark, you would read a figure we partly computed as one the publisher printed.
Every estimate is built only from data we may redistribute
Passed
Why it matters An estimate derived from restricted data would pass that data on under our open licence, which its owner never allowed.
No estimated factor is rated above the data it was built from
Passed
Why it matters An estimate cannot be more reliable than its inputs. Rating it higher would lead you to trust it more than a published figure.
No estimate is served where the publisher printed the figure
Passed
Why it matters When the publisher states the number itself, theirs is the one to use. An estimate beside it would give you two answers to the same question.
Every estimated factor still matches the inputs it was computed from
Passed
Why it matters When an input is revised or withdrawn, the estimate built on it is out of date until it is recomputed.
Every factor with a current value has a default
Passed
Why it matters A factor with values but no default is left out of the served catalogue, so you would never find it in search or exports.
Every factor has a value, in a library that publishes values
Passed
Why it matters A factor listed with no number looks like a match in search but gives you nothing to calculate with.
Every fixed group of regions lists what it covers
Passed
Why it matters A group like “Europe outside the EU” with no member list cannot be placed, so its factor values never match a search for any country in it.
Where both exist, the residual mix is shown before the green-tariff zero
Passed
Why it matters Green electricity counts as zero only for buyers who hold the matching certificates. Showing zero by default would understate everyone else's emissions.
The newest edition of each value is the one marked current
Passed
Why it matters If an older edition stayed marked as current, you would get superseded numbers, or two answers for the same factor.
Factor descriptions describe the factor, not the whole library
Passed
Why it matters When the same long text is repeated on every factor, it tells you nothing about the one you are looking at and hides what is specific to it.
Every library's licence has its rights recorded
Passed
Why it matters Without them, the library page cannot tell you what you may do with the data: share it, change it or use it commercially.
Every green-electricity zero is exactly zero and says why
Passed
Why it matters A green-tariff factor is zero by rule. Any other number, or a zero with no stated reason, would mean the rule was applied wrongly.
Green-electricity zeros cover power generation only
Passed
Why it matters Certificates cover the power plant's emissions, not grid losses or the upstream fuel chain. A zero on those stages would understate your Scope 2 and Scope 3 figures.
Only a total we computed may mix GWP vintages
Passed
Why it matters A published row states one GWP vintage. A mix of AR5 and AR6 can only come from a total assembled out of several rows, and saying so tells you the number was computed, not published.
Spend factors state their price year and basis
Passed
Why it matters A 2019 euro is not a 2024 euro, and a purchaser price includes margins a basic price does not. Without both, spend footprints drift.
Every value has a number, a GWP version and a reference year
Passed
Why it matters Without the number there is nothing to multiply. Without the GWP version or the year, you cannot tell whether two values are comparable.
No factor description is too long to display in full
Passed · 4 in all libraries
Why it matters Text beyond the limit is cut short on the factor page, so part of what the publisher wrote shows only in the download.
Every excused arithmetic disagreement is stated
Passed
Why it matters Where a publisher's own total does not equal its parts and we serve it anyway, the exception is listed on every audit run rather than left in code where nobody sees it.
Every reference year falls between 1960 and next year
Passed
Why it matters A year outside that range points to a typo or a misread column, and would put the value in the wrong period when you filter by year.
The parts of a total are never listed twice under one label
Passed
Why it matters A group that repeats a part label is a list of terms, not a split of the total, so adding its rows up would count some emissions twice.
Every residual mix has its green-tariff counterpart
Passed
Why it matters Market-based Scope 2 reporting needs both: the residual mix for ordinary contracts and a zero for certified green power. With one missing, you have to find it elsewhere.
Every factor points to its top parent
Passed
Why it matters Search groups parts under their top factor. A stale link shows a part as a stand-alone result.
Every publisher's quality rating system is read
Passed
Why it matters If we do not read a publisher's rating system, its values are treated as unrated and marked down, although the publisher rated them.
No factor is an unlinked part of another factor
Passed
Why it matters If one stage of a total is also served on its own, beside that total, adding both counts the same emissions twice.
A part covering the same scope as its total is linked to it
Passed
Why it matters When a part and the total beside it cover exactly the same scope, nothing in the numbers tells them apart. Linking them stops you adding a part to the total that already contains it.
A year in a factor's name matches its reference year
Passed
Why it matters A name like “Grid 2019” on a 2023 value usually means a yearly series was flattened, so you could apply one year's figure to another.

How the audit works

What can I do with this data?

Open licence · credit the publisher

Your rights

Open licence · pdl-1.0

Use it to calculate my own footprint: Yes
Publish my footprint results: Yes, if
you credit the publisher
you say what you changed
Share the file with my customers: Yes, if
you credit the publisher
you say what you changed
Put the factors in a product I sell: Yes, if
you credit the publisher
you say what you changed
Modify it or combine it with my own data: Yes, if
you credit the publisher
you say what you changed

Named licence, checked on 16 Aug 2026

Public Data License 1.0 (Digital Agency, Japan): reuse including commercial use (商用利用も可能です), with the source credited and any modification stated; no use-restriction clause.

Credit line

Data: 出典：電気事業者別排出係数（環境省・経済産業省）https://policies.env.go.jp/earth/ghg-santeikohyo/calc.html — Source: Emission factors by electricity business operator (Ministry of the Environment / Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry), PDL1.0. Normalised by open-climate.ai, https://open-climate.ai/factors/libraries/japan_moe (CC BY 4.0)

Not legal advice: the publisher's terms prevail.

Full terms

How to read these answers

Coverage

What the library covers, by category and by boundary. Click a slice to drill in, then a sub-category or a boundary to filter the factors below.

By category

1,663factors

Click a slice to see what is under it. Click a name to hide it from the ring.

By boundary

1,663factors

Click a slice to see what is under it. Click a name to hide it from the ring.

Browse factors

Currency

top 0 matches

Saved	Unfold	Activity		Sub-category	Region	Boundary			Unit	GWP

Versions

How this works

Checked for updates 18 Sept 2026: the publisher still shows the edition we serve (1 signal watched)

Version	Published	Loaded	Status	Source
R8	–	24 Sept 2026	Served	Source

Methodology

How this works

Values are kg CO2 per unit. Only fossil CO2 is counted, so no GWP set applies. Biomass fuels carry no CO2 factor.
Each electricity, gas and heat supplier publishes a basic coefficient and an adjusted one that reflects the certificates it holds. The basic coefficient is the default we serve.
Supplier coefficients are market-based. A retailer's coefficient is an average over its own customers. Residual menus, what is left after the named menus, are marked as residual.
Electricity and heat are counted at generation, the buyer's Scope 2. City gas and fuels are counted at combustion, Scope 1.
Years follow the Japanese fiscal year. Electricity menu and residual coefficients are FY2025; whole-company and reference values are FY2024. Gas is FY2025 and heat FY2024. The fuel factors are statutory constants, dated to the list's 2025 edition.
Electricity retailers report a capture rate: the share of the electricity they sold whose generation source they could identify. We serve it as the quality rating, where higher is better and anything below 100 calls for caution.

Data year: the Japanese fiscal year the table states, never the filename's. One release carries two -- FY2025 for the named supplier menus, FY2024 for the company-level and reference rows.

What we import

The reporting cycle R8 (Reiwa 8): the electricity register in its fourth revision of 2026-08-03, the city gas and heat registers, and the fuel table of the master list.
1,663 factors: 1,472 electricity retail coefficients, 114 city gas, 39 heat, 35 fuels, and the Okinawa grid operator, the national average and the electricity substitute value.
Okinawa is placed on its own region: its grid coefficient is 0.707 kg CO2 per kWh against a national average of 0.423.
Where the adjusted coefficient is zero and the basic one is not, we serve the zero as a second, certificate-backed value beside the default.
Not imported: the adjusted coefficient where both are positive and differ (12 suppliers, kept in our archive), the nine mainland grid operators that report the national average, the non-CO2 half of the master list, and earlier editions.
Names are Japanese at source; English names are translated.

Licence

How this works

Open. The coefficients are published under the Public Data License 1.0 (PDL1.0), which allows commercial use and redistribution, with no ShareAlike, with attribution: "Source: Emission factors by electricity business operator (Ministry of the Environment / Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry), PDL1.0."

PDL1.0 also asks that edited data say it was edited, and by whom. The values served here are restructured by open-climate.ai, and must not be presented as the ministries' unmodified output.

What can I do with this data?

Credit line: 出典：電気事業者別排出係数（環境省・経済産業省）https://policies.env.go.jp/earth/ghg-santeikohyo/calc.html — Source: Emission factors by electricity business operator (Ministry of the Environment / Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry), PDL1.0

pdl-1.0

Limitations

507 values are zero, mostly menus supplied entirely from non-fossil sources. A matched line on such a menu reports no emissions.
For 27 electricity rows the publisher rejected the computed coefficient as abnormal and substituted another value. That mark is not yet shown here.
A dash in place of the capture rate means the rate could not be computed and the publisher applied a substitute value. It is the worst case, not missing information: treat those rows with more caution than their rating suggests.
Mainland grid operators, whose coefficient applies to last-resort and remote island supply, report the national average and are not listed here by name. Use the national average for that supply.
Only the R8 cycle is loaded. The ministries update the registers during the year.

Changelog

2026-09-12: retailer coefficients labelled as averages over each retailer's customers.
2026-09-07: English names for every retailer and menu.
2026-08-25: R8 cycle loaded, electricity register revision 4.

Know a newer edition?

If Japan MOE has published an edition we do not serve yet, tell us where to find it.